Table of Contents

• From Book to Screen: The Adaptation Process
• Avoiding the ‘Rouwfilm’ Trap
• Structuring the Narrative: Chronology and Choice
• Historical Context: Project 22 and the Fight for Equality
• Future Implications: Representation and Queer Cinema

From Book to Screen: The Adaptation Process

The journey from page to screen wasn’t straightforward. Fleur Pierets received numerous offers to adapt her book, but consistently rejected them. “When the book came out, I was approached by many production companies who wanted to film it, but always for the wrong reasons,” Pierets explains. “They wanted to make a grief film, while the story, for me, is about love and about what an individual can do to (try to) change the world.” The turning point came with the recommendation to connect with the Dhont brothers, Lukas and Michiel, known for their sensitive and nuanced storytelling. However, even with their involvement, the initial inclination towards a sorrowful portrayal persisted. “We talked to a lot of directors. They all wanted to make a grief film too. I didn’t want that,” Pierets recounts. The pivotal moment arrived with the introduction to Cato Kusters, a director whose understanding of the story’s core resonated deeply with Pierets. “She had just read the book. The way she talked about the book, I thought: ‘look, you get it. That’s how I meant it.’ Cato had invited us to see her graduation film. It was so fantastic. It suddenly became very clear that we had found our director.”

Avoiding the ‘Rouwfilm’ Trap

Cato Kusters echoes Pierets’ sentiment, emphasizing her immediate connection to the material. “At the moment we met, I had no agenda. I knew the story and I was completely wild about it. I think through our conversations, it became clear to both of us that the story had crept under my skin.” Kusters proactively demonstrated her directorial vision by inviting Pierets and the Dhont brothers to view her graduation film, allowing them to experience her filmmaking style firsthand. Pierets admits she initially wondered who would ultimately take on the project, but Kusters’ enthusiasm and clear intentions quickly dispelled any doubts. Kusters’ commitment was solidified when she immediately began outlining a chronological structure for the film after receiving a call from Michiel Dhont. This proactive approach signaled her genuine passion and understanding of the story’s nuances.

Structuring the Narrative: Chronology and Choice

One of the biggest challenges in adapting the book was translating its narrative structure to the screen. Kusters explains, “I think the biggest challenge was deciding how to tell the story chronologically, while still maintaining the emotional impact and thematic resonance of the book.” This involved careful consideration of pacing, flashbacks, and the overall flow of the narrative. The filmmakers consciously avoided a purely linear approach, opting for a structure that allowed them to explore the complexities of Fleur and Julian’s relationship and the evolution of Project 22. This decision was crucial in ensuring that the film remained focused on the celebration of love and activism, rather than solely dwelling on the tragedy of Julian’s illness.

Historical Context: Project 22 and the Fight for Equality

Project 22, the central driving force of the film, is deeply rooted in the historical struggle for LGBTQ+ rights. The film doesn’t shy away from showcasing the varying degrees of acceptance and legal recognition of same-sex marriage across different countries. In 2019, when the book was published, only a limited number of nations had legalized same-sex marriage. The project itself was a bold and symbolic act, highlighting the disparities in rights and advocating for global equality. The film serves as a reminder of the progress made, but also acknowledges the ongoing fight for full and equal rights for queer individuals worldwide. It’s a testament to Julian’s vision and the couple’s unwavering commitment to social justice. The film’s timing, released in a world still grappling with issues of inclusivity and discrimination, makes its message particularly resonant.

Future Implications: Representation and Queer Cinema

Julian represents a significant contribution to queer cinema. By prioritizing the love story and the activism over the tragedy, the film offers a refreshing and empowering portrayal of queer lives. It challenges the often-stereotypical narratives that dominate mainstream media, presenting a nuanced and authentic representation of a couple’s journey. The film’s success could pave the way for more diverse and inclusive storytelling in the future, encouraging filmmakers to explore queer narratives with sensitivity and respect. Furthermore, the film’s international scope – mirroring Project 22 – has the potential to spark conversations and inspire activism on a global scale. It’s a film that not only entertains but also encourages empathy and understanding.

Key Takeaways

• Julian skillfully avoids the pitfalls of becoming a solely grief-focused narrative, instead centering the story on love, activism, and the power of individual action.
• The collaborative relationship between Fleur Pierets and Cato Kusters was crucial in ensuring the film remained true to the spirit of the book.
• Project 22 serves as a powerful historical reminder of the ongoing fight for LGBTQ+ rights and the importance of global equality.
• The film’s nuanced and authentic portrayal of a queer relationship has the potential to inspire more diverse and inclusive storytelling in cinema.

Dutch Learning Corner