AI Self-Diagnosis: ChatGPT as the New WebMD

The internet has long been a first stop for self-diagnosis, with WebMD reigning supreme as the go-to resource for anxious symptom checkers. But a new player has entered the arena: generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Gemini. Increasingly, people are turning to these AI tools not just for dinner recipes, but for complex legal and medical advice. This shift is creating a fascinating, and sometimes concerning, dynamic between professionals and the public, as clients and patients arrive armed with AI-generated information – often inaccurate or incomplete – and a newfound sense of expertise. The rise of AI self-diagnosis is here, and it’s changing everything.

Table of Contents

• The Rise of AI Advice
• Impact on the Legal Profession
• Impact on the Medical Profession
• The Democratization of Information (and its pitfalls)
• Future Implications

The Rise of AI Advice

A December 2023 survey from Clio revealed that 57% of consumers have or would use AI to answer a legal question. Similarly, a 2024 Zocdoc survey found that one in three Americans use generative AI tools for health advice weekly, with one in ten using them daily. These numbers are staggering, demonstrating a rapid adoption of AI as a primary source of information. This isn’t simply about looking up symptoms; people are seeking interpretations, potential diagnoses, and even legal strategies. The accessibility and ease of use of these tools are key drivers. Unlike traditional research methods, which can be time-consuming and require sifting through complex jargon, AI chatbots offer instant, seemingly personalized responses.

Impact on the Legal Profession

Miami-based medical malpractice attorney Jonathan Freidin notes a clear trend: client intake forms increasingly feature text copied and pasted from ChatGPT, often adorned with emojis. Clients are arriving believing they have a strong case simply because an AI chatbot told them so. Jamie Berger, a family law attorney in New Jersey, echoes this sentiment. She’s observed a shift from clients seeking basic information about divorce proceedings to presenting fully formed legal strategies generated by AI. The challenge for lawyers isn’t necessarily debunking the AI’s suggestions (though that’s often necessary), but rebuilding trust and establishing a collaborative attorney-client relationship when the client already believes they have all the answers. The AI provides a generic gameplan, failing to account for the specific nuances of each case.

Impact on the Medical Profession

The implications for healthcare are equally significant. Zocdoc CEO Oliver Kharraz predicts AI will become the go-to for symptom checking and routine tasks. While he acknowledges the potential benefits, he also cautions that AI is “no substitute for the vast majority of healthcare interactions, especially those that require human judgment, empathy, or complex decision-making.” However, the sheer volume of patients arriving with self-diagnoses based on AI-generated information is already straining doctor-patient relationships. Doctors are spending more time dispelling misinformation and explaining the limitations of AI, rather than focusing on accurate diagnosis and treatment. The potential for misdiagnosis and delayed care is a serious concern. Furthermore, the reliance on AI can discourage individuals from seeking professional medical attention when it’s truly needed.

The Democratization of Information (and its pitfalls)

Generative AI has undeniably democratized access to information. Previously, legal and medical expertise was often expensive and difficult to obtain. Now, anyone with an internet connection can access a wealth of knowledge – or, at least, what appears to be knowledge. However, this democratization comes with significant pitfalls. AI chatbots are trained on vast datasets, but these datasets are not always accurate or up-to-date. AI can also be prone to biases, leading to skewed or misleading information. Crucially, AI lacks the critical thinking skills and contextual understanding of a human expert. It cannot account for individual circumstances, medical history, or the complexities of the legal system. The result is a generation of “armchair experts” who overestimate their understanding and may make ill-informed decisions.

Future Implications

The trend of AI self-diagnosis is likely to accelerate. As AI technology continues to improve, chatbots will become even more sophisticated and persuasive. This will necessitate a greater emphasis on media literacy and critical thinking skills. Professionals in both the legal and medical fields will need to adapt their communication strategies to address the misconceptions and expectations created by AI. We may see the development of AI-powered tools designed to assist professionals in debunking misinformation and providing accurate, personalized advice. Ultimately, the key will be to harness the power of AI while mitigating its risks, ensuring that it complements, rather than replaces, human expertise. Regulation will also likely play a role, with potential guidelines for AI-generated medical and legal advice to protect consumers from harm.

Key Takeaways

• AI is the new Google for self-diagnosis, but it’s not a replacement for professional advice. Don’t treat ChatGPT like a doctor or lawyer – it’s a starting point, not the final answer.
• Be wary of AI-generated certainty. AI can present information as fact, even when it’s based on incomplete or inaccurate data. Always double-check and seek expert confirmation.
• The attorney-client and doctor-patient relationships are evolving. Professionals need to be prepared to address AI-fueled misconceptions and rebuild trust with clients and patients.

Dutch Learning Corner